← All New England markets
Competitive Analysis — Providence–New Bedford DMA · YTD

Providence–New Bedford Market Competitive Analysis

9 firms make up the local and regional legal-advertising field in Providence, RI–New Bedford, MA year-to-date, running roughly 96% Broadcast / 3% vMVPD / 1% CTV. This view measures delivered viewing volume.

Market Impressions
291M
9-firm competitive set · YTD
Firms Tracked
9
Providence–New Bedford · YTD
Streaming Share
23%
151M · of full-market delivery
Market Leader
Rob Levine Law
118M · 41% share of voice
Competitive Landscape

Who's running — and where

Across Providence, RI–New Bedford, MA, 1,172 legal advertisers were detected delivering in market year-to-date — the vast majority national connected-TV spilling into the DMA. The local and regional competitive set of 9 firms delivered 291M impressions year-to-date, running roughly 96% Broadcast / 3% vMVPD / 1% CTV/Streaming. The bars below contrast the full detected market with that set, by share.

Full Providence–New Bedford Market (1,172 advertisers · 657M impressions) · Share of Delivery
Broadcast 69%
vMVPD 8%
CTV 23%
Broadcast 455M · vMVPD 50M · CTV 151M
Providence–New Bedford Competitive Set (9 firms · 291M impressions) · Share of Delivery
Broadcast 96%
3%
1%
Broadcast 279M · vMVPD 8.3M · CTV 3.4M
Broadcast (local stations & cable)
vMVPD (live-TV streaming bundles)
CTV / Streaming (true OTT apps)
Delivered Impressions by Channel (YTD)
#FirmShare of Voice
of competitive set
Total Impressions
delivered · YTD
Channel MixBroadcast %vMVPD %CTV %
Majors
1Rob Levine Law40.6%118M
95%4%1%
2Bottaro Law Firm29.8%87M
98%2%0%
3d'Oliveira & Associates25.7%75M
97%2%1%
4Law Offices of Joe Bornstein1.4%4.0M
78%7%15%
5Calvino Law Associates0.6%1.8M
98%2%0%
Mid-Pack
6Law Offices of Lawrence J Signore0.6%1.8M
62%2%36%
7Moretti Perlow & Bonin0.6%1.7M
98%2%0%
8Law Office of John L Calcagni III0.5%1.4M
94%3%3%
9Law Offices of Ronald J Resmini0.3%993K
97%2%1%

Share of Voice is each firm's share of the 9-firm competitive set shown here — not the full market.

Publisher Intelligence

Share of voice — who owns what

Share of voice across the competitive set — the 9 firms competing in Providence–New Bedford year-to-date, by publisher.

Publisher Volume — Impressions (YTD)
Competitor Share of Voice by Publisher Each firm's share of the competitive set's impressions on that publisher.
Firms: Rob Levine LawBottarod'Oliveira & AssociatesLaw Offices of Joe BornsteinCalvino Law AssociatesLaw Offices of Lawrence J SignoreMoretti Perlow & BoninLaw Office of John L Calcagni IIILaw Offices of Ronald J Resmini

Ranked competitor detail by publisher

Each card is one publisher. Top 5 advertisers ranked by SOV on that publisher. Click Show all to expand to every competitor in the set with measurable impressions.

WJAR
Broadcast
105M impressions · 38% of set · 9 of 9 active
  1. 1
    Rob Levine Law
    44M
    41.4%
  2. 2
    Bottaro
    39M
    36.8%
  3. 3
    d'Oliveira & Associates
    18M
    17.0%
  4. 4
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    1.8M
    1.7%
  5. 5
    Calvino Law Associates
    1.3M
    1.3%
Show all 9 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Law Office of John L Calcagni III
    1.2M
    1.2%
  2. 7
    Law Offices of Lawrence J Signore
    525K
    0.5%
  3. 8
    Law Offices of Ronald J Resmini
    249K
    0.2%
  4. 9
    Moretti Perlow & Bonin
    546
    0.0%
WPRI
Broadcast
95M impressions · 34% of set · 8 of 9 active
  1. 1
    d'Oliveira & Associates
    34M
    35.8%
  2. 2
    Bottaro
    32M
    33.4%
  3. 3
    Rob Levine Law
    27M
    28.4%
  4. 4
    Moretti Perlow & Bonin
    1.1M
    1.1%
  5. 5
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    858K
    0.9%
Show all 8 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Law Offices of Ronald J Resmini
    301K
    0.3%
  2. 7
    Calvino Law Associates
    863
    0.0%
  3. 8
    Law Office of John L Calcagni III
    455
    0.0%
WNAC
Broadcast
63M impressions · 23% of set · 6 of 9 active
  1. 1
    Rob Levine Law
    29M
    46.5%
  2. 2
    d'Oliveira & Associates
    20M
    31.7%
  3. 3
    Bottaro
    13M
    19.9%
  4. 4
    Moretti Perlow & Bonin
    614K
    1.0%
  5. 5
    Law Offices of Ronald J Resmini
    409K
    0.6%
Show all 6 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    186K
    0.3%
OTA
Broadcast
2.9M impressions · 1% of set · 9 of 9 active
  1. 1
    Rob Levine Law
    1.2M
    41.7%
  2. 2
    Bottaro
    1.1M
    36.2%
  3. 3
    d'Oliveira & Associates
    581K
    19.8%
  4. 4
    Law Office of John L Calcagni III
    25K
    0.8%
  5. 5
    Law Offices of Lawrence J Signore
    15K
    0.5%
Show all 9 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Calvino Law Associates
    14K
    0.5%
  2. 7
    Moretti Perlow & Bonin
    7K
    0.3%
  3. 8
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    4K
    0.1%
  4. 9
    Law Offices of Ronald J Resmini
    1K
    0.0%
XFINITY Streaming
vMVPD
2.8M impressions · 1% of set · 9 of 9 active
  1. 1
    Rob Levine Law
    1.9M
    68.1%
  2. 2
    Bottaro
    359K
    12.8%
  3. 3
    d'Oliveira & Associates
    349K
    12.5%
  4. 4
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    161K
    5.8%
  5. 5
    Moretti Perlow & Bonin
    7K
    0.3%
Show all 9 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Calvino Law Associates
    7K
    0.2%
  2. 7
    Law Office of John L Calcagni III
    4K
    0.2%
  3. 8
    Law Offices of Ronald J Resmini
    4K
    0.1%
  4. 9
    Law Offices of Lawrence J Signore
    2K
    0.1%
Verizon Fios Streaming
vMVPD
1.8M impressions · 1% of set · 9 of 9 active
  1. 1
    Rob Levine Law
    819K
    46.1%
  2. 2
    Bottaro
    458K
    25.8%
  3. 3
    d'Oliveira & Associates
    410K
    23.1%
  4. 4
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    55K
    3.1%
  5. 5
    Law Office of John L Calcagni III
    9K
    0.5%
Show all 9 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Moretti Perlow & Bonin
    8K
    0.4%
  2. 7
    Law Offices of Lawrence J Signore
    7K
    0.4%
  3. 8
    Calvino Law Associates
    6K
    0.3%
  4. 9
    Law Offices of Ronald J Resmini
    5K
    0.3%
Cox Streaming
vMVPD
1.6M impressions · 1% of set · 9 of 9 active
  1. 1
    Rob Levine Law
    615K
    37.3%
  2. 2
    Bottaro
    528K
    32.0%
  3. 3
    d'Oliveira & Associates
    443K
    26.8%
  4. 4
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    25K
    1.5%
  5. 5
    Moretti Perlow & Bonin
    11K
    0.7%
Show all 9 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Law Office of John L Calcagni III
    8K
    0.5%
  2. 7
    Law Offices of Lawrence J Signore
    7K
    0.4%
  3. 8
    Calvino Law Associates
    6K
    0.4%
  4. 9
    Law Offices of Ronald J Resmini
    5K
    0.3%
YouTube TV App
vMVPD
1.3M impressions · 0% of set · 9 of 9 active
  1. 1
    Rob Levine Law
    566K
    44.1%
  2. 2
    Bottaro
    357K
    27.8%
  3. 3
    d'Oliveira & Associates
    308K
    24.0%
  4. 4
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    26K
    2.0%
  5. 5
    Law Office of John L Calcagni III
    11K
    0.8%
Show all 9 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Calvino Law Associates
    9K
    0.7%
  2. 7
    Law Offices of Ronald J Resmini
    7K
    0.6%
  3. 8
    Law Offices of Lawrence J Signore
    676
    0.1%
  4. 9
    Moretti Perlow & Bonin
    630
    0.0%
YouTube App
Streaming App
1.0M impressions · 0% of set · 8 of 9 active
  1. 1
    Law Offices of Lawrence J Signore
    585K
    58.0%
  2. 2
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    208K
    20.6%
  3. 3
    d'Oliveira & Associates
    115K
    11.4%
  4. 4
    Bottaro
    73K
    7.2%
  5. 5
    Rob Levine Law
    25K
    2.5%
Show all 8 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Calvino Law Associates
    1K
    0.1%
  2. 7
    Law Office of John L Calcagni III
    540
    0.1%
  3. 8
    Law Offices of Ronald J Resmini
    180
    0.0%
NESN
989K impressions · 0% of set · 4 of 9 active
  1. 1
    Rob Levine Law
    772K
    78.1%
  2. 2
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    205K
    20.7%
  3. 3
    Bottaro
    6K
    0.6%
  4. 4
    d'Oliveira & Associates
    6K
    0.6%
  5. 5
WJLP
Broadcast
749K impressions · 0% of set · 5 of 9 active
  1. 1
    Calvino Law Associates
    379K
    50.6%
  2. 2
    Bottaro
    352K
    46.9%
  3. 3
    Law Office of John L Calcagni III
    8K
    1.0%
  4. 4
    d'Oliveira & Associates
    6K
    0.7%
  5. 5
    Law Offices of Ronald J Resmini
    5K
    0.7%
Amazon Fire
Device
555K impressions · 0% of set · 9 of 9 active
  1. 1
    Rob Levine Law
    291K
    52.4%
  2. 2
    Bottaro
    93K
    16.8%
  3. 3
    d'Oliveira & Associates
    92K
    16.6%
  4. 4
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    60K
    10.9%
  5. 5
    Law Offices of Lawrence J Signore
    11K
    2.0%
Show all 9 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Law Office of John L Calcagni III
    4K
    0.7%
  2. 7
    Moretti Perlow & Bonin
    1K
    0.3%
  3. 8
    Calvino Law Associates
    1K
    0.2%
  4. 9
    Law Offices of Ronald J Resmini
    901
    0.2%
Roku
Device
458K impressions · 0% of set · 9 of 9 active
  1. 1
    Rob Levine Law
    234K
    51.0%
  2. 2
    d'Oliveira & Associates
    113K
    24.7%
  3. 3
    Bottaro
    52K
    11.2%
  4. 4
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    48K
    10.5%
  5. 5
    Law Offices of Lawrence J Signore
    8K
    1.8%
Show all 9 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Law Office of John L Calcagni III
    2K
    0.4%
  2. 7
    Moretti Perlow & Bonin
    945
    0.2%
  3. 8
    Law Offices of Ronald J Resmini
    540
    0.1%
  4. 9
    Calvino Law Associates
    495
    0.1%
Other App
Streaming App
429K impressions · 0% of set · 9 of 9 active
  1. 1
    Rob Levine Law
    183K
    42.8%
  2. 2
    d'Oliveira & Associates
    141K
    33.0%
  3. 3
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    49K
    11.4%
  4. 4
    Bottaro
    38K
    8.8%
  5. 5
    Law Offices of Lawrence J Signore
    6K
    1.4%
Show all 9 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Law Office of John L Calcagni III
    5K
    1.1%
  2. 7
    Law Offices of Ronald J Resmini
    4K
    1.0%
  3. 8
    Calvino Law Associates
    1K
    0.3%
  4. 9
    Moretti Perlow & Bonin
    720
    0.2%
WLNE
Broadcast
402K impressions · 0% of set · 5 of 9 active
  1. 1
    Bottaro
    174K
    43.3%
  2. 2
    d'Oliveira & Associates
    113K
    28.1%
  3. 3
    Rob Levine Law
    108K
    26.9%
  4. 4
    Law Office of John L Calcagni III
    7K
    1.7%
  5. 5
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    273
    0.1%
Competitor Creative

The creative landscape

Active spots running in the Providence market this period.

RLL
For The Fences
Rob Levine Law
Personal Injury
BLF
Contact Us
Bottaro Law Firm
Personal Injury
DA
Free Consultation
d'Oliveira & Associates
Personal Injury
LOOJ
Free Case Evaluation
Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
Personal Injury

Methodology and Definitions

1. Data Sourcing & Collection

Our platform uses Automatic Content Recognition (ACR) to capture real-time viewing data from the "glass" of over 23 million opted-in U.S. households, across a diverse panel of devices (Vizio, LG) and peripheral inputs. Each captured ad is fingerprinted and matched against a comprehensive ad library to verify when and where it aired.

A note on reading this data. These figures are drawn from a representative smart-TV panel, so they are best read as a strong directional indicator of in-market presence rather than an exact census of delivery. Channel mix and share-of-voice percentages are the most reliable view. Impression counts are included for scale, but can vary from market to market and may not perfectly reflect exact delivery splits.

2. Competitive Set & Scope

This report covers the legal advertisers competing for clients in the market — firms based here or in a neighboring state with a genuine local presence. Non-law advertisers, and national campaigns that only spill incidental connected-TV impressions into the market, are excluded so the field reflects real local competition.

For large national advertisers, we judge local presence by their share of local-broadcast delivery — the signal that a firm is actually buying local affiliate inventory, not just airing national connected-TV. A national advertiser such as Morgan & Morgan is included in a market only where a meaningful share of its delivery runs on local broadcast affiliates; where an advertiser delivers almost entirely through national connected-TV with negligible local broadcast, it is set aside as spillover. Share of voice and all channel splits are measured across this set.

3. Channel Categorization

Each advertiser's activity is split across three mutually exclusive channels.

Broadcast
Local station-originated linear & cable inventory
Local OTA broadcast affiliates (ABC/NBC/CBS/FOX), national broadcast networks, syndicated broadcast, and traditional linear cable + satellite (Xfinity, Spectrum, Cox, Charter, DirecTV dish, Dish Network) — viewed via antenna or linear MVPD carriage.
vMVPD
Streaming delivery of linear feeds
YouTube TV, Hulu Live, Sling, fuboTV, Philo, DirecTV Stream, Cox Streaming, XFINITY Streaming, Spectrum Streaming, Dish Streaming, Uverse Streaming. Streaming delivery, but content includes broadcast-originated station feeds — kept as a separate line for clarity.
CTV / Streaming
True streaming, app-based CTV
Ad-supported streaming apps (Peacock, Pluto, Tubi, Paramount+), peripheral devices (Roku, Fire TV, Apple TV, Xbox, PlayStation), FAST channels, and digital video / app-based CTV inventory.

Publisher definitions

4. Key Attribution Information

Why vMVPD is its own line. When a viewer watches a local broadcast affiliate through a streaming bundle (YouTube TV, DirecTV Stream, Cox Streaming, Hulu Live, etc.), the delivery is internet-based but the content is broadcast-originated linear. Buyers and sellers treat vMVPD distinctly from both pure broadcast and true OTT — so we report it as a separate line rather than rolling it into either.

Satellite vs. streaming MVPDs. DirecTV satellite dish is reported as Cable. DirecTV Stream (the internet-delivered linear app) is reported as vMVPD.

OTA (Over-the-Air). Free broadcast signals received via antenna from local ABC/NBC/CBS/FOX affiliates. Reported under Broadcast.

A predominantly broadcast-led advertiser will still show single-digit-to-low-teens CTV/Streaming exposure in this view because ACR captures actual viewing across the connected-TV panel — including incidental impressions on Roku, Fire TV, Tubi, Apple TV, Pluto, Peacock, network broadcaster apps, and similar ad-supported streaming platforms. Those carry their own ad inventory distinct from the linear feed (and from vMVPDs), so they're reported under CTV / Streaming.

5. Glossary