← All New England markets
Competitive Analysis — Springfield-Holyoke DMA · YTD

Springfield-Holyoke Market Competitive Analysis

11 firms make up the local and regional legal-advertising field in Springfield-Holyoke, MA year-to-date, running roughly 42% Broadcast / 36% vMVPD / 22% CTV. This view measures delivered viewing volume.

Market Impressions
69M
11-firm competitive set · YTD
Firms Tracked
11
Springfield-Holyoke · YTD
Streaming Share
48%
92M · of full-market delivery
Market Leader
Sweeney Merrigan Injury Law
27M · 39% share of voice
Competitive Landscape

Who's running — and where

Across Springfield-Holyoke, MA, 1,070 legal advertisers were detected delivering in market year-to-date — the vast majority national connected-TV spilling into the DMA. The local and regional competitive set of 11 firms delivered 69M impressions year-to-date, running roughly 42% Broadcast / 36% vMVPD / 22% CTV/Streaming. The bars below contrast the full detected market with that set, by share.

Full Springfield-Holyoke Market (1,070 advertisers · 189M impressions) · Share of Delivery
Broadcast 31%
vMVPD 21%
CTV 48%
Broadcast 58M · vMVPD 39M · CTV 92M
Springfield-Holyoke Competitive Set (11 firms · 69M impressions) · Share of Delivery
Broadcast 42%
vMVPD 36%
CTV 22%
Broadcast 29M · vMVPD 25M · CTV 16M
Broadcast (local stations & cable)
vMVPD (live-TV streaming bundles)
CTV / Streaming (true OTT apps)
Delivered Impressions by Channel (YTD)
#FirmShare of Voice
of competitive set
Total Impressions
delivered · YTD
Channel MixBroadcast %vMVPD %CTV %
Majors
1Sweeney Merrigan Injury Law39.4%27M
44%37%19%
2Alekman DiTusa22.9%16M
34%26%40%
3Haymond Law Firm15.9%11M
45%38%17%
4Cava Law Firm5.8%4.0M
49%41%10%
5Raipher, PC5.3%3.7M
46%35%19%
Mid-Pack
6Law Office of Eric Kornblum4.7%3.2M
40%49%11%
7Law Offices of Joe Bornstein2.4%1.6M
45%34%21%
8McLane & McLane Attorneys at Law2.2%1.5M
32%53%15%
9Johnson, Sclafani & Moriarty, Attorneys at Law0.6%398K
32%57%11%
10KC Law Kevin Chrisanthopoulos0.5%351K
55%38%7%
11CB White Law0.4%292K
41%24%35%

Share of Voice is each firm's share of the 11-firm competitive set shown here — not the full market.

Publisher Intelligence

Share of voice — who owns what

Share of voice across the competitive set — the 11 firms competing in Springfield-Holyoke year-to-date, by publisher.

Publisher Volume — Impressions (YTD)
Competitor Share of Voice by Publisher Each firm's share of the competitive set's impressions on that publisher.
Firms: Sweeney Merrigan Injury LawAlekman DiTusaHaymondCavaRaipher, PCLaw Office of Eric KornblumLaw Offices of Joe BornsteinMcLane & McLane Attorneys at LawJohnson, Sclafani & Moriarty, Attorneys at LawKC Law Kevin ChrisanthopoulosCB White Law

Ranked competitor detail by publisher

Each card is one publisher. Top 5 advertisers ranked by SOV on that publisher. Click Show all to expand to every competitor in the set with measurable impressions.

XFINITY Streaming
vMVPD
15M impressions · 22% of set · 11 of 11 active
  1. 1
    Sweeney Merrigan Injury Law
    6.2M
    41.5%
  2. 2
    Alekman DiTusa
    2.5M
    16.8%
  3. 3
    Haymond
    2.4M
    15.9%
  4. 4
    Law Office of Eric Kornblum
    955K
    6.4%
  5. 5
    Cava
    954K
    6.4%
Show all 11 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Raipher, PC
    822K
    5.5%
  2. 7
    McLane & McLane Attorneys at Law
    500K
    3.3%
  3. 8
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    360K
    2.4%
  4. 9
    Johnson, Sclafani & Moriarty, Attorneys at Law
    155K
    1.0%
  5. 10
    KC Law Kevin Chrisanthopoulos
    88K
    0.6%
  6. 11
    CB White Law
    40K
    0.3%
WGGB
Broadcast
7.7M impressions · 11% of set · 9 of 11 active
  1. 1
    Sweeney Merrigan Injury Law
    3.3M
    42.9%
  2. 2
    Alekman DiTusa
    1.6M
    21.3%
  3. 3
    Haymond
    1.6M
    20.4%
  4. 4
    Cava
    461K
    6.0%
  5. 5
    Raipher, PC
    369K
    4.8%
Show all 9 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    146K
    1.9%
  2. 7
    KC Law Kevin Chrisanthopoulos
    73K
    1.0%
  3. 8
    CB White Law
    71K
    0.9%
  4. 9
    Law Office of Eric Kornblum
    62K
    0.8%
OTA
Broadcast
7.5M impressions · 11% of set · 11 of 11 active
  1. 1
    Sweeney Merrigan Injury Law
    3.0M
    39.5%
  2. 2
    Haymond
    1.4M
    18.8%
  3. 3
    Alekman DiTusa
    1.4M
    18.4%
  4. 4
    Cava
    515K
    6.8%
  5. 5
    Raipher, PC
    482K
    6.4%
Show all 11 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Law Office of Eric Kornblum
    272K
    3.6%
  2. 7
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    180K
    2.4%
  3. 8
    Johnson, Sclafani & Moriarty, Attorneys at Law
    127K
    1.7%
  4. 9
    McLane & McLane Attorneys at Law
    83K
    1.1%
  5. 10
    KC Law Kevin Chrisanthopoulos
    70K
    0.9%
  6. 11
    CB White Law
    35K
    0.5%
WWLP
Broadcast
6.0M impressions · 9% of set · 8 of 11 active
  1. 1
    Sweeney Merrigan Injury Law
    1.7M
    28.2%
  2. 2
    Alekman DiTusa
    1.3M
    20.8%
  3. 3
    Law Office of Eric Kornblum
    947K
    15.7%
  4. 4
    Haymond
    664K
    11.0%
  5. 5
    Cava
    485K
    8.0%
Show all 8 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    McLane & McLane Attorneys at Law
    377K
    6.2%
  2. 7
    Raipher, PC
    363K
    6.0%
  3. 8
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    250K
    4.1%
Other App
Streaming App
5.9M impressions · 8% of set · 11 of 11 active
  1. 1
    Alekman DiTusa
    4.7M
    79.3%
  2. 2
    Sweeney Merrigan Injury Law
    529K
    9.0%
  3. 3
    Haymond
    214K
    3.6%
  4. 4
    Raipher, PC
    159K
    2.7%
  5. 5
    Cava
    97K
    1.6%
Show all 11 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Law Office of Eric Kornblum
    73K
    1.2%
  2. 7
    CB White Law
    68K
    1.2%
  3. 8
    McLane & McLane Attorneys at Law
    38K
    0.6%
  4. 9
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    28K
    0.5%
  5. 10
    Johnson, Sclafani & Moriarty, Attorneys at Law
    8K
    0.1%
  6. 11
    KC Law Kevin Chrisanthopoulos
    6K
    0.1%
Spectrum Streaming
vMVPD
5.0M impressions · 7% of set · 11 of 11 active
  1. 1
    Sweeney Merrigan Injury Law
    2.0M
    40.2%
  2. 2
    Haymond
    1.1M
    22.1%
  3. 3
    Alekman DiTusa
    745K
    14.8%
  4. 4
    Cava
    306K
    6.1%
  5. 5
    Law Office of Eric Kornblum
    290K
    5.8%
Show all 11 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Raipher, PC
    215K
    4.3%
  2. 7
    McLane & McLane Attorneys at Law
    151K
    3.0%
  3. 8
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    113K
    2.2%
  4. 9
    Johnson, Sclafani & Moriarty, Attorneys at Law
    43K
    0.9%
  5. 10
    KC Law Kevin Chrisanthopoulos
    24K
    0.5%
  6. 11
    CB White Law
    14K
    0.3%
WSHM
Broadcast
4.9M impressions · 7% of set · 8 of 11 active
  1. 1
    Sweeney Merrigan Injury Law
    3.4M
    68.2%
  2. 2
    Haymond
    590K
    12.0%
  3. 3
    Alekman DiTusa
    555K
    11.3%
  4. 4
    Raipher, PC
    177K
    3.6%
  5. 5
    Cava
    156K
    3.2%
Show all 8 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    44K
    0.9%
  2. 7
    KC Law Kevin Chrisanthopoulos
    43K
    0.9%
  3. 8
    Law Office of Eric Kornblum
    2K
    0.0%
YouTube App
Streaming App
3.2M impressions · 5% of set · 11 of 11 active
  1. 1
    Sweeney Merrigan Injury Law
    2.5M
    75.8%
  2. 2
    Haymond
    580K
    17.9%
  3. 3
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    97K
    3.0%
  4. 4
    Alekman DiTusa
    49K
    1.5%
  5. 5
    Raipher, PC
    29K
    0.9%
Show all 11 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Law Office of Eric Kornblum
    18K
    0.6%
  2. 7
    Cava
    9K
    0.3%
  3. 8
    McLane & McLane Attorneys at Law
    3K
    0.1%
  4. 9
    KC Law Kevin Chrisanthopoulos
    456
    0.0%
  5. 10
    CB White Law
    342
    0.0%
  6. 11
    Johnson, Sclafani & Moriarty, Attorneys at Law
    171
    0.0%
YouTube TV App
vMVPD
2.8M impressions · 4% of set · 11 of 11 active
  1. 1
    Sweeney Merrigan Injury Law
    978K
    34.9%
  2. 2
    Alekman DiTusa
    611K
    21.8%
  3. 3
    Haymond
    403K
    14.4%
  4. 4
    Cava
    252K
    9.0%
  5. 5
    Law Office of Eric Kornblum
    213K
    7.6%
Show all 11 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Raipher, PC
    201K
    7.2%
  2. 7
    McLane & McLane Attorneys at Law
    72K
    2.6%
  3. 8
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    36K
    1.3%
  4. 9
    KC Law Kevin Chrisanthopoulos
    12K
    0.4%
  5. 10
    Johnson, Sclafani & Moriarty, Attorneys at Law
    11K
    0.4%
  6. 11
    CB White Law
    11K
    0.4%
Roku
Device
2.4M impressions · 3% of set · 11 of 11 active
  1. 1
    Sweeney Merrigan Injury Law
    809K
    34.3%
  2. 2
    Haymond
    545K
    23.1%
  3. 3
    Alekman DiTusa
    438K
    18.6%
  4. 4
    Cava
    145K
    6.2%
  5. 5
    Raipher, PC
    137K
    5.8%
Show all 11 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Law Office of Eric Kornblum
    108K
    4.6%
  2. 7
    McLane & McLane Attorneys at Law
    71K
    3.0%
  3. 8
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    61K
    2.6%
  4. 9
    Johnson, Sclafani & Moriarty, Attorneys at Law
    24K
    1.0%
  5. 10
    KC Law Kevin Chrisanthopoulos
    10K
    0.4%
  6. 11
    CB White Law
    9K
    0.4%
Amazon Fire
Device
1.6M impressions · 2% of set · 11 of 11 active
  1. 1
    Sweeney Merrigan Injury Law
    504K
    31.9%
  2. 2
    Alekman DiTusa
    295K
    18.6%
  3. 3
    Raipher, PC
    269K
    17.0%
  4. 4
    Haymond
    235K
    14.9%
  5. 5
    Cava
    94K
    5.9%
Show all 11 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Law Office of Eric Kornblum
    80K
    5.1%
  2. 7
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    44K
    2.8%
  3. 8
    McLane & McLane Attorneys at Law
    41K
    2.6%
  4. 9
    Johnson, Sclafani & Moriarty, Attorneys at Law
    9K
    0.5%
  5. 10
    KC Law Kevin Chrisanthopoulos
    6K
    0.4%
  6. 11
    CB White Law
    3K
    0.2%
DirecTV Streaming
vMVPD
1.4M impressions · 2% of set · 11 of 11 active
  1. 1
    Sweeney Merrigan Injury Law
    561K
    39.8%
  2. 2
    Alekman DiTusa
    245K
    17.4%
  3. 3
    Haymond
    224K
    15.9%
  4. 4
    Cava
    106K
    7.5%
  5. 5
    Law Office of Eric Kornblum
    96K
    6.8%
Show all 11 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Raipher, PC
    66K
    4.7%
  2. 7
    McLane & McLane Attorneys at Law
    54K
    3.8%
  3. 8
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    31K
    2.2%
  4. 9
    Johnson, Sclafani & Moriarty, Attorneys at Law
    15K
    1.1%
  5. 10
    KC Law Kevin Chrisanthopoulos
    6K
    0.5%
  6. 11
    CB White Law
    4K
    0.3%
FNC
842K impressions · 1% of set · 4 of 11 active
  1. 1
    Haymond
    406K
    48.2%
  2. 2
    Raipher, PC
    230K
    27.3%
  3. 3
    Cava
    206K
    24.4%
  4. 4
    Sweeney Merrigan Injury Law
    852
    0.1%
  5. 5
Tubi TV App
Streaming App
819K impressions · 1% of set · 8 of 11 active
  1. 1
    Sweeney Merrigan Injury Law
    381K
    46.5%
  2. 2
    Alekman DiTusa
    359K
    43.8%
  3. 3
    Haymond
    30K
    3.7%
  4. 4
    Raipher, PC
    19K
    2.3%
  5. 5
    Law Offices of Joe Bornstein
    18K
    2.2%
Show all 8 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    CB White Law
    8K
    1.0%
  2. 7
    Cava
    2K
    0.3%
  3. 8
    Law Office of Eric Kornblum
    2K
    0.3%
NECN
409K impressions · 1% of set · 4 of 11 active
  1. 1
    Sweeney Merrigan Injury Law
    405K
    99.0%
  2. 2
    Law Office of Eric Kornblum
    2K
    0.5%
  3. 3
    Haymond
    2K
    0.4%
  4. 4
    Cava
    284
    0.1%
  5. 5
Competitor Creative

The creative landscape

Active spots running in the Springfield-Holyoke market this period.

SMIL
Call Now
Sweeney Merrigan Injury Law
Personal Injury
AD
Talk To Me
Alekman DiTusa
Personal Injury
HLF
For Injured People
Haymond Law Firm
Personal Injury
CLF
Winning Is No Accident
Cava Law Firm
Personal Injury
JSM
You Are Not Alone
Johnson, Sclafani & Moriarty
Personal Injury

Methodology and Definitions

1. Data Sourcing & Collection

Our platform uses Automatic Content Recognition (ACR) to capture real-time viewing data from the "glass" of over 23 million opted-in U.S. households, across a diverse panel of devices (Vizio, LG) and peripheral inputs. Each captured ad is fingerprinted and matched against a comprehensive ad library to verify when and where it aired.

A note on reading this data. These figures are drawn from a representative smart-TV panel, so they are best read as a strong directional indicator of in-market presence rather than an exact census of delivery. Channel mix and share-of-voice percentages are the most reliable view. Impression counts are included for scale, but can vary from market to market and may not perfectly reflect exact delivery splits.

2. Competitive Set & Scope

This report covers the legal advertisers competing for clients in the market — firms based here or in a neighboring state with a genuine local presence. Non-law advertisers, and national campaigns that only spill incidental connected-TV impressions into the market, are excluded so the field reflects real local competition.

For large national advertisers, we judge local presence by their share of local-broadcast delivery — the signal that a firm is actually buying local affiliate inventory, not just airing national connected-TV. A national advertiser such as Morgan & Morgan is included in a market only where a meaningful share of its delivery runs on local broadcast affiliates; where an advertiser delivers almost entirely through national connected-TV with negligible local broadcast, it is set aside as spillover. Share of voice and all channel splits are measured across this set.

3. Channel Categorization

Each advertiser's activity is split across three mutually exclusive channels.

Broadcast
Local station-originated linear & cable inventory
Local OTA broadcast affiliates (ABC/NBC/CBS/FOX), national broadcast networks, syndicated broadcast, and traditional linear cable + satellite (Xfinity, Spectrum, Cox, Charter, DirecTV dish, Dish Network) — viewed via antenna or linear MVPD carriage.
vMVPD
Streaming delivery of linear feeds
YouTube TV, Hulu Live, Sling, fuboTV, Philo, DirecTV Stream, Cox Streaming, XFINITY Streaming, Spectrum Streaming, Dish Streaming, Uverse Streaming. Streaming delivery, but content includes broadcast-originated station feeds — kept as a separate line for clarity.
CTV / Streaming
True streaming, app-based CTV
Ad-supported streaming apps (Peacock, Pluto, Tubi, Paramount+), peripheral devices (Roku, Fire TV, Apple TV, Xbox, PlayStation), FAST channels, and digital video / app-based CTV inventory.

Publisher definitions

4. Key Attribution Information

Why vMVPD is its own line. When a viewer watches a local broadcast affiliate through a streaming bundle (YouTube TV, DirecTV Stream, Cox Streaming, Hulu Live, etc.), the delivery is internet-based but the content is broadcast-originated linear. Buyers and sellers treat vMVPD distinctly from both pure broadcast and true OTT — so we report it as a separate line rather than rolling it into either.

Satellite vs. streaming MVPDs. DirecTV satellite dish is reported as Cable. DirecTV Stream (the internet-delivered linear app) is reported as vMVPD.

OTA (Over-the-Air). Free broadcast signals received via antenna from local ABC/NBC/CBS/FOX affiliates. Reported under Broadcast.

A predominantly broadcast-led advertiser will still show single-digit-to-low-teens CTV/Streaming exposure in this view because ACR captures actual viewing across the connected-TV panel — including incidental impressions on Roku, Fire TV, Tubi, Apple TV, Pluto, Peacock, network broadcaster apps, and similar ad-supported streaming platforms. Those carry their own ad inventory distinct from the linear feed (and from vMVPDs), so they're reported under CTV / Streaming.

5. Glossary